Wrike and Asana are the most popular and easy-to-use project management tools. Project management has evolved with the inclusion of software to simplify work. Technology integrated programs enable data monitoring, seamless streams, easy integration, and a user-friendly interface.
You can’t choose the better size based on its size or how many users love it. Wrike and Asana users can control their progress from one central platform. These technologies are all you need to run your cooperation and its team.
Creating many systems casts a cloud over knowing the ultimate software to use for your business. Asana and Wrike both get lots of love from project managers because of their simplicity and versatility. They have proven to be the leaders with their outstanding performance in management activities in a company, regardless of size.
If you’re thinking of implementing one or both of these tools in your company, then, this review is for you as it is a contentious fight between Asana and Wrike. This article outlines the limitations, specialities, and best features of both software.
1. Wrike vs Asana: Features
Asana has all the best things a project tool should have. Both Wrike and Asana have advanced features integrated. The user experience in Asana is out of this world. The software simplifies its features by spreading them according to plans elaborated underpricing. This software can help you achieve a whole lot more than you thought was possible.
Asana and Wrike have a lot in common. In Wrike, you have to go through the list view to open a new document; You don’t have to do that with Asana. Asana has a vibrant crossing point that attracts you at first sight. This arrangement of tools on Asana is simple, giving it a better visual. Wrike is integrated with a table view and spreadsheet arrangement, which makes it complicated and tedious when scrolling through tools.
Kanban Boards & Gantt Charts
Kanban board is used for drag and drop actions, and both surfaces have the latest edition. The kanban board interface on Wrike outperforms that of Asana. Wrike uses a negative view with an artistic arrangement of kanban-based tools suited for different projects.
Gantt chart is a tool for uninterrupted connection for running tasks and arranges task dependence. Both contenders do it well with Gantt charts, although Asana seems more colourful with an intelligent display.
Wrike runs the Gantt chart ideally compared to Asana. Gantt chart has a collection of colours and best fits Wrike because of its traditional display, which has an overview for monitoring subtask activities. This view enables arranging your task dependencies on the order of appearance to your taste. However, the Gantt chart on Wrike has a poor graphical look at its dependencies task.
Asana has a colourful display and does the required actions, displaying a spreadsheet of tasks indicated by their elapsing time. However, Wrike has a more flexible calendar schedule. You can place your activities according to your program at different levels and monitor the date and progress.
Asana and Wrike show you a world of doodahs to run your projects more manageably. Wrike has a reported flaw, and the time-tracking device is missing.
The drawback with Wrike is its reports and inability to monitor projects. This setback is below some underdogs of this game. The tool compensates users with a report screen that displays the task and each day’s activities. You can easily monitor and assign tasks through the report screen.
Going head-to-head on reports, Asana has an excellent report display but not as much as Wrike. Wrike has its tools integrated on every task, making projects easy to monitor and recommended for workers that demand payment by the hour.
The Asana software uses a cheat called the Harvest app to perform such actions. The Harvest app is excellent with robust programming but lacks a time-tracking dashboard like Wrike.
So far, there has been a fair comparison between both software. The fight seems relatively balanced. However, taking a close look at the upgraded functions of both programs, Asana has robust tools that place it among the elite of advanced tech masters. Wrike enables you to run your company’s future goals by setting and monitoring your team’s progress from your targeted goal.
Asana has a portfolio of tools to run different projects at the same time. This tool is best for vivid explanations and summaries of your projects’ performance. Wrike has a similar plethora of tools, but Asana is way ahead of the advancement of such tools. The workload feature on Asana is perfect for checking up on your team members and monitoring their progress.
2. Wrike vs Asana: Integrations
Integration is a crucial point in judging who’s best. Asana has better ways of managing its integration compared to Wrike. Asana has a higher tier and advanced integration with high performance. Similarly, Wrike has the same tools but adds certain plug-ins on a specific level. For instance, if you want a particular add-on like Salesforce, you’ll have to download the add-on through a higher tier.
Asana wins the round of features and functions. The software performs better with an enjoyable user interface, but its flaw is time-tracking and reports. Wrike flaw is on-task spreadsheets are separated into two views, making it difficult for users to get detailed information.
3. Wrike Vs Asana: Pricing
There is a narrow winning margin of Asana over Wrike on pricing. The winning margin gets thinner as we proceed. Asana costs more because of its extra oomph on a user-friendly experience and easy-to-use functions. However, let’s thoroughly discuss the money value of their subscription plan.
Value for Money
The first review will be on paid or premium plans for small businesses. Prices for both software are fair and comparable. To have Asana’s Premium plan for a month, you need to save up $11, and for the Wrike Profession plan, you’ll save up $10 or less in a month. The little added dollar will get you more features and a user-friendly interface with extra tools to robust your software.
For example, Asana has a rare feature of unlimited storage space in the cloud compared to other storage providers. Google Drive account is the fastest way to save your Wrike or Asana work. On the other hand, Wrike has a limited storage space starting from 2GB, expanding to 100GB. This gives Wrike users a little storage option for their projects.
Asana also proves more expensive when subscribing to a Business plan. As aforementioned, Asana software is worth the extra penny because it integrates additional features and a user-friendly interface. However, you may be attracted to the method used by Wrike to manage its calendar.
The Wrike Vs Asana Free Plan
Both software programs have free plans. Their free plan features are considered among software with remarkable free features. Both have a plethora of free tools with exciting and colourful interaction for free software.
For any software you choose, you’ll get the essential tools with a well-designed interface to manage a small work team. Wrike is doing good for the free plan but not as good as Asana. For a start, Asana offers unlimited cloud storage for free users.
However, it is best to test the demo of both software to get a better understanding. The demo version serves you the basic features while restricting advanced tools. The Premium plans also have a free trial for a specific time, allowing you to decide within 14 days on their premium plan. After these free days, you can go on a whirl on the software that you feel is better.
4. User Interface/Experience
Asana has no runner-up for a user-friendly interface. Wrike has an organized way of arranging tasks, making it easy to spin. However, the benefits do not surpass the complex and ugly display of the software. Asana has a better user interface that displays colourful sheets with details on each project. You can quickly get information about a project from an instant look.
As aforementioned in the features section, Asana is displayed on a multicoloured board, making the view eye-catching, and the slides are listed on the screen. You can quickly locate a task, monitor your team effort on such tasks, check who is anchoring the task, and the expiring time. The kanban board tool has users’ drag–and–drop options. Wrike’s kanban board is better, but Asana’s kanban board is more sophisticated and eye-catching.
Amateurs can learn the functions of Asana quickly. Locating your previous works is accessible through the display screen or the portfolio if you’re subscribed to a Business plan. So, Asana is the friendliest to use for project management tasks.
Ease of Navigation
Wrike is also user-friendly, but it gets complicated when switching between portfolios. You have to click through different overview screens to reach the functionalities, unlike Asana. The processing effect is minor but noticeable as it happens often. As mentioned earlier, Wrike has a traditional form of arranging tabs, making it easy to navigate. This old-school structure runs navigation like a charm.
Wrike may have an easy navigation pattern but has a dull user interface. The displays are poor and make the design look old with no arrangement of colour. The software developers need to take extra measures to correct the Wrike colour display to influence technology. This flaw makes Asana the winner of this round.
5. Security & Privacy
Asana has won three out of three rounds over Wrike. However, Wrike will win this round as the software has better security than its contender. While Asana runs on the widely used storage method, Wrike operates on its form of storage. The software is robust with the AES-256 cypher and functions on TLS when moving files. The software has its own storage servers used in encrypting files stored and controlled by the company, making it hard for invaders.
AWS has widely used in programming most tools in the management industry, as so does Asana. AWS has minor flaws in its function of keeping your files safe. The program works appropriately with intriguing performance but has a poor security blockage. Your store files can easily be infiltrated or stolen by third-party as the server is popular among users.
Wrike vs Asana Privacy
Asana and Wrike’s privacy policies are foggy. The guidelines are not strict and well protected. For instance, Asana can dependably sell free users’ information to third parties. On the bright side, the data will be sold as anonymous, which might be a relief for the user but still counts as a flaw in keeping their policies with free users.
6. Wrike vs Asana : Customer Support
The final round is on customer service. Both software has strong ratings on this round. Asana and Wrike are created with dependable functioning forums, a decent support team, and knowledge bases. Links are provided to most problems faced by users on the platform. These links are connected to articles written on how such a common problem can be solved for use. The information design in each knowledge base is easy to locate and read.
The forums are dominated mainly by users of this software as well as officials or agents you can get in touch with for help where the articles don’t. You can post your issue on the forum, and you can be assured of a reply either from a member or an agent. Additionally, their webpage has a supporting customer agent you can chat with for information concerning a problem or an enquiry on the software.
Final Verdict: Wrike vs Asana
Wrike seems to have topped the review with a wide margin. However, Asana has user-friendly tools, colourful interfaces, and a wide range of user management tools.
Wrike will serve better in some organizations and others in Asana. Depending on what you intend to do, each software has its merits and shortcomings in performing its duties. However, Asana is the better of both for comprehensive project works.
Are you drawn to Asana’s colourful interface or Wrike’s functionality? You can test the waters by enjoying the free 14 days trial offered by both software to know the best for your projects.
Looking for team collaboration tools?